Sunday, May 31, 2015

Chicago Music on a College Student Budget

My passion for Chicago, the city’s people, and its music grew this weekend.

I went to a free concert in the city.

That’s right—free. 

I can’t express my gratitude enough for Chicago’s willingness to embrace free concerts that broke college students like me can attend.  Chicago is home to a rich establishment of pricey musical events that take months to pay for either because you’re saving up or… waiting for your parents to finally cave.  It’s okay-we’ve all done it.

You have to take the good with the bad… Isn’t that what they always say?  Well, they’re right.  Paying as low as $15 or less up to as high as over a couple hundred dollars for concerts, performances, festivals can burn a hole in your wallet.  And yes, even that $15 can burn the hole-college students, back me up.  

But we go to them, right?  We still choose to save even those couple hundred bucks that we don’t have, those couple hundred bucks that should be saved for more serious items like school books and our future car; we still choose to beg our parents endlessly.  

We go to them because we appreciate the beauty of musicand how significant it is to our lives; we go to them because we understand how vital it is to make time for pure enjoyment, and how vital it is to take breaks from the more solemn aspects of life; we go to them because we’re human, and we like spending money on things that we’ll probably regret later, but for right now, are so worth it.  

So my point is that we have to take the good with the bad… that irrespectively of the many substantial expenses Chicago entails for entertainment, we’ll continue to proceed buying the tickets regardless; and most importantly, the city still provides musical events that everyone can join, whether two cents in your pocket or two hundred dollars.  It’s not Chicago’s fault the city is so expensive and that certain artists necessitate costly expenditure, so visit the concerts that Chicago can afford, without the demand for excessive ticket prices.  Not to mention these places--these restaurants, hotspots, bars, venues—don’t make ample revenue; they acquire earningsby holding an exciting, upbeat enough experience so that attendees will buy drinks, food, clothing, etc.  The fact that these places remain insistent says a lot about Chicago-that the city encompasses spots not only comprised of unselfish business and workers, but that these spots are lively enough to still profit successful income from visitors.

With all that being said, I realize that several of these concerts denote entertainers that may be distinctively new, have few experience, and often may be assumingly less talented.  While I must elucidate the concert I went to heldan imposing performance with what seemed like extremely talented performers; they were considered novel artists that did have less experience… which indicates my reasoning behind my flourished love for the people of Chicago.  

We don’t care.    

First ‘RSVP’ing,’ I felt particularly concerned whether the concert would be noticeably more monotonous due to the lack of overall familiarity regarding the song selection.  I agonizingly suspected the prospective crowd as resembling minimal motion, virtually no singing, chanting, or reciting of words or lyrics; worse, I fretted there wouldn’t even be a large enough crowd to resemble and observe.  

I was wrong.  

Upon arriving via cab, the driver explained the venue was “right on the corner,” and we’d run into it.  We were walking and searching longer than anticipated leading us tocheck our phones only to ascertain we had gone too far.  We reversed directions and walked back to the original place the driver was last—we had not even realized that the corner was directly in front of us.  We didn’t notice it… because we failed by underestimating the tremendously extensive line of people waiting to get in the concert that lingered outside the hall throughout the street.  My friends then told me the RSVPs closed within just a few hours after being postedwhich in terms of non-free concerts, this performance theoretically ‘sold out’ fleetingly.  

The people loved it.  The suspected absence of a full, copious crowd resembled a jam-packed, overflowing crowd, embodying a lavish variety of diverse individuals and dispositionsthe suspected motionless crowd resembled an exceptionally active crowd, vigorously dancing, jumping, and swaying; the suspected crowd personifying lack of caroling resembled remarkable chanting, endeavoring to grow acquainted enough with therap lyrics in order to partake in the songs.

I’d say these people were nice to the new artists, but that’s both too simple as well as potentially rendering the performers out to be less gifted if fans had to be ‘nice.’  I say, rather, the people were respectful.  They understand and take into keen account the probable dearth of experience, practice, and involvement with both this business and live experiences; they value their inclination to try; they acknowledge their motivation to execute an exhausting, notable performance, paying no mind to scarce revenue gains

I love the people of Chicago because we respect new artists, melodies, and performances.  We attend these concerts with poise and maturity, choosing to grasp newfound talent in an entertainer and neglect all oddstargeting the artists’ little performance background.  

Never to disregard the people of Chicago exhibit a desire for new music in general.  

We’re fiends for the latest up-to-date songs we can blare loudly; we’re fiends for innovative lyrics we can memorize; we’re fiends for the hottest new artists we can look up to and fawn over.  I love the people of Chicago because we appreciate the old, and we welcome the new.  We undyingly crave listening to new songs and artists while remaining unconditionally persistent to listen to those previous.  

My fellow concertgoers gave these performers and their music a chance.  They chose to stay through five full hours of a concert presenting uncommonly renowned rap artists that rapped limited songs and lyrics they knew.  And the ones they did know, the ones the rappers introduced as covers, they went wild for, joining in crowd harmony as they danced in constant motion and deafeningly rappedalong with the artist.  

The people’s enthusiasm for both new music and old helped incite my prospered passion for music.  I had never been to a concert with artists I knew nothing about performing unfamiliar songs.  Quite frankly, when my boyfriend brought it up I was greatly hesitant, though the experience further escalated my need for music and performances.  I discern my uncertainty as happening for a reason… that because my expectations were so low and the result was so high, I became better mindful of my adoration for the musical process itself.  I realize that I need notmandate solely artists I know personally and their lyrics I’ve remembered committedly-I’ll have the time of my life at a show as long as it has an artist to purely sing and lyrics to become conversant.  

This concert aided in my emerging passion for Chicago.  Through Chicago, my passion for people grew--through the people, my passion for music grew—and vise versa.  

Chicago remains home to kindling and rekindling all versions of love.  Free concerts became an addition to mylist of the city’s sundry sources of provoking my inner passions

So next time you’re bored, visit a free concert.  Even if you don’t know the artist, listening to beloved music genres live sure beats sitting at home.  

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

The Wonderful World of Virtual Communities

A media course this term required being an actual member of an online community for a set period of time in order to relay and explain the rich culture that embodies virtual communities.  We were to explore similar communities as well to better enhance our understanding.

I chose Pinterest, We Heart It, and Photobucket, in which I was introduced to the wonderful world of sharing and appreciating photography.














The hectic lifestyle a student, family member, boyfriend, friend, and internee entails limits much of my free time.  While I love my field of study, relationships, and job, I often miss the creative, free of pressure habits that life sets its damper.  I find deep fascination and passion for art, even more so with the process of taking and viewing photos-which is why these communities were perfect for me and suited my interests.

I learned that there's positives and negatives to online communities.

Positives:
  • Enhancement of knowledge concerning interest
  • Sharing of your own knowledge concerning interest
  • Feeling welcome among a group
  • Career, innovational, professional opportunities
  • Building personal profiles
  • Boosting confidence and self-awareness
Negatives:
  • Loss of human contact
  • Potential decrease in reading and research ability
  • Possibility of harsh and hurtful words and arguments
  • Potential lack of confidence in person
  • Fear/failure of eye contact

With Any Negative, Comes a Positive

With any negative criticism, there comes positive.  No matter the topic, they’ll remain two or more sides holding opposing opinions, in which each viewpoint encompasses evidence, reason, and debate providing credibility. 

In Facebook’s case, there’s been those critiquing the site as a ‘filter bubble,’ as previously explored in my blog, and those critiquing Facebook as balanced and fair; they perceive it as simply filtering information that we would most likely care to be updated, on the most consistent basis.  That is, whether or not there’s components such as ads and news that should receive greater emphasis, at the end of the day, this generation will get worn-out with posts that aren’t more personal and less relative-and more times than not, users would rather receive constant friend updates rather than more serious or professional matters.
As I’ve reasoned with the harsh criticism, I reason with the optimistic.  Though critics have warned Facebook, I feel Facebook is concentrated on the more youthful, less solemn opinions due to their most frequent usage; no young adult who’s uninvolved with media matters will desire to request a more editorial timeline.  Considering this, whether or not more information such as news-reporting should be implemented, the vast majority of users don’t want that, and the site wasn’t originally created for that, so why would Facebook change that and risk losing its audience and purpose? 

Don't Let Facebook Brainwash You.

Recently deemed a ‘filter bubble’ among critics, Facebook’s believed to filter only what it wants, producing a bubble of information unable to be popped with outside sources of material. 

I have many viewpoints supporting Facebook’s timeline, though I reason with these individuals.

I can’t deny certain aggravation Facebook’s provoked.  For example, they turn on your notifications--in which you have to go out of your way to search and find to turn off--for sending you updates on friends they choose to inform you. 

With how financially and reputably successful Facebook has become, they should have all the resources and motives necessary to further deepen the filter they discern most beneficial, helpful, and personal to us.
Even more, the ample quantity of promoted advertisements via Facebook has grown rampant-this is where I most intrinsically perceive this alleged filter bubble.  With the variety of ads encompassing Facebook, I feel it should be more cognizant of our interests and thus more invested in sponsoring them.  I wouldn’t mind viewing ads so much have they not be so non-relatable; I also wouldn’t mind observing articles and links related to current news issues I’d find interesting.  People aren’t fully acquainted with how often they search for news and the extent of news out there-they’d be unexpectedly, pleasantly surprised to learn of events they find fascinating for once.

Facebook should listen to the entirety of all critics’ opinion; they don’t negate the site as inferior.  They’re merely trying to warn it-because they do believe in its resources and don’t want to witness its downfall.  They don’t yearn for these harsh perspectives; they just don’t want it to get so severe as to become the transformation from a filter bubble… to utter brainwashing.

Facebook & New York Times Partnership

 Companies are shrewd to utilize social media to their advantage.  It helps get a name out there, making the content of their information as both easily accessible as well as edifying as possible.  Therefore, it’s evident news organizations would benefit significantly, for social media promotes prevalence merely because of the uncomplicated distribution of content (essentially shared articles that entail little to no effort). 

One news company had it right; New York Times contracted a partnership to Facebook this May.  As if New York Times doesn’t already hold an illustrious title, they will further their business by appealing to those Facebook users that maybe not so much necessarily haven’t heard of NYT, but for those users that aren’t particularly fascinated with the news overall-in which when Facebook forces the viewing of posts concerned with news issues, they’ll be their primary news source.

New York Times once again fruitfully becomes one of the utmost, most prominent news corporations of today’s audience. 

I’m ready to see a change.  I have not a single complaint or negative utterance to say regarding NYT; I’m encouraging, rather, alternate businesses encompassing news related material and measures to follow in the Facebook engagement approach.  I’ve elucidated my standpoint regarding Facebook’s prospective impact on news--that it can be effectively delivered by means of timelines.  If Facebook chose to embody an array of news reporting, I’d hope that both its technical easiness as well as the societal precedence put on Facebook would lead to enhancing both comprehensive awareness of topics—as well as enhancing comprehensive research knowledge of valid news sources--as users would be introduced to a novel variety of news foundations that go beyond the customary.  

If Twitter can do it, so can Facebook!

If you really invested some time into thinking about your Facebook timeline, what would you envision?  That’s easy I’m sure-shared links, photos, statuses, possibly a few ‘suggested’ or ‘sponsored’ ads. 

The vast, if not all, majority of these posts were exclusively created by friends on Facebook; that is, who you’re kept stable, consistent updates on are the hundreds, possibly thousands or additional, Facebook friends that you desire. 

Not essentially erroneous, though numerous critics have introduced the notion regarding Facebook as a potential news source, in which its contribution to breaking, international, daily, and more news could be tremendously impactful… and also beneficial. 

I consider these critics to hold reasonable argument.  While I don’t remain having a cynical attitude concerning Facebook’s modes of presenting information, I am involved in a journalistic field and heed the significance of news.  Courses teach that the need for news has remained undeviating; originally hearing that, my primary thought was ‘mmm… not so much.’  I struggled believing that because before beginning my love for media, I, and friends around or my age, rarely go out of our way to read newspapers, watch the news, look into virtual news articles or links-I failed to recognize the several variations of discovering and retrieving news.  

I didn’t take into account the extent to which we hear news via car radios, other channels on television, and frankly, word of mouth.  It seems irrational, though we converse on such a constant basis and it’s such a repetitive, habitual daily occurrence that not only do we fail to notice how much time we spend in dialogue, but how much is spoken about when communicating. 



I reconsidered-we don’t take strong enough note that we speak about issues regarding news almost exceptionally.  Whether we’re discussing political, local, school, personal news, we’re still constantly discussing it; we’re attracted to storytelling and reports that make us feel like we’re there. 

And the reason we like such vividly detailed storytelling is because we don’t like to feel like we missed out… on anything.  We don’t realize… but if we were put 10 years, even 10 days, back and were forced to read old or ancient news, we’d grow senseless.  So maybe a few people and I scuffle finding motive to read news-but we still yearn for it subconsciously as well as receive it with ease when presented to us by the instant. 

And ‘presented to us by the instant’ is more commonly distinct within the many mediums of social media, another way to which we hear the magnitude of news that I didn’t take into consideration; Twitter stands as a concrete example of sharing news for professional, promotional, and personal means.  That being said, the critics that demand a news-reporting role for Facebook have a point; if other sites can successfully do it and there’s a way news can be integrated to individuals’ everyday lives, why not? 

This could be extremely beneficial to society.  Just as following in the normative system of delivering and getting news, people would still be accessing information involuntarily, but accessing it nonetheless.  I believe there’s still a further technique to incorporate news while keeping users regularly cognizant, informed, and up-to-date with personal ties.

4 Reasons Lollapalooza is a Good 1st Festival


Blogging has allowed me to express my passion for music and concerts-festivals in particular.
I decided to go into greater detail regarding Lollapalooza.
I think it’s necessary I clarify throughout my festival-hopping years, I’ve developed a favorite… and it’s not Lollapalooza.  My favorite is North Coast Musical Festival-but that doesn’t matter. 
It doesn’t matter because my objective doesn’t aim to target my top reasons behind my superlative preference.  I’m here to list my top reasons behind why I feel Lollapalooza is a positive primary choice for those deciding which festival to experience this summer. 
1. Their music relates to all people.
Whatever music genre you favor, Lollapalooza embraces all. 
I had the time of my life at Spring Awakening, but you won’t find much besides Electric Dance Music and DJs such as Tiesto and Knife Party.  Alternative festivals such as North Coast and Bonnaroo are additional events that hold equivalent variations of music, though Lollapalooza encompasses music for more than just the diverse genres of our generation… but the diverse genres of all generations. 
They have concerts for old rock, hip-hop, heavy metal, and more.  And I say old as in ‘old school’ type of music… as in even our elders would find motive to listen to those in the line-up of Lollapalooza.
It’s a good initial step for getting you accustomed to the constant vibrations from the stages and speakers surrounding you.  Even if you’re a die-hard lover of a specific genre, almost always people can find even a few opposing songs of differing genres they enjoy. 
There’s more to a festival than just listening to music.  People are here because they appreciate the beauty of music overall.  So I say if you’re a beginner, appreciate it all first-and then go from there.
2. Their atmosphere embodies all ages.
There’s something to be said for a festival you can even bring your kids.
And I say that because I’ve seen a lot when it comes to these events. 
No one can deny nor defend that much of these festivals denote an abundance of young adults severely intoxicated or on drugs.  There’s been an excessive amount of talk concerning the younger generation today and their influence on concerts, EDM concerts in particular.  The overwhelming truth holds that these concerts have been home to not only this generation’s alcohol abuse, but their abuse of drugs such as those like MDMA, Ecstasy, LSD, and more; enough statistics relaying the hospital expenses and even deaths of these young adults has been rampant and alarming.
So while I’d be lying if I claimed I’d yet to see such instances at Lollapalooza, I’m telling the truth when I say you won’t see this on nearly as many occasions, as opposed to many others.
You see children and adults of all ages, which is comforting for someone who is purely there for the music and not the dangerous means to partying. 
3. You’re surrounded by all styles of people.
To say certain festivals resemble certain bodies of people is an understatement.
It’s no stereotype that Spring Awakening is a festival of beads, flashy attire, and psychedelic souvenirs.  Young individuals embellish their bodies with beads all down their limbs and face and flamboyant, sometimes provocative, inappropriate clothing; they bring and buy tools such as colorful hula hoops and light up gloves in order to make a hallucinogenic experience for their fellow festival goers.
But not at Lollapalooza.  You see these people, though without such predominance. 
I find this so vital to a first experience as a result of my comparison to my own.  I evoke initially arriving at such a festival and feeling utterly out of place with everyone around me.  My friends were dressed correspondingly, but such a limited set of average dressed friends in a sea of such glitzy dressed individuals is intimidating. 
Avoid feeling unwelcome… especially if you’re just not one to typically dress that way.  There’s further concerts that suit your love for music while also suiting your style.
4. “Boxed water is better.”
This reads on Lollapalooza’s untraditional boxed water.
Less deep, more silly, but a reason nonetheless.
Lollapalooza remains a worthy beginner merely because of its interesting, unique features.
No more bottled water-they offer BOXED.  Sound outlandish?  Maybe so-but they’ve racked up exceptional business and production through their willingness to offer boxed water rather than bottled.
These boxes are essentially much more fulfilling than bottles, so when there the first day and growing irately cognizant of how hot and exhausted you are, you’ll be pleased to discover a set of water that suffices your needs.  Not to mention their attractive appearance that makes your experience seem that much more exceptional and unlike all the others.