Companies are shrewd to utilize social media to their
advantage. It helps get a name out
there, making the content of their information as both easily accessible as
well as edifying as possible. Therefore,
it’s evident news organizations would benefit significantly, for social media
promotes prevalence merely because of the uncomplicated distribution of content
(essentially shared articles that entail little to no effort).
One news company had it right; New
York Times contracted a partnership to Facebook this May. As if New York Times doesn’t already hold an
illustrious title, they will further their business by appealing to those
Facebook users that maybe not so much necessarily haven’t heard of NYT, but for
those users that aren’t particularly fascinated with the news overall-in which
when Facebook forces the viewing of posts concerned with news issues, they’ll be their primary news source.
New York Times once again fruitfully becomes one of the utmost,
most prominent news corporations of today’s audience.
I’m ready to see a change.
I have not a single complaint or negative utterance to say regarding
NYT; I’m encouraging, rather, alternate businesses encompassing news related
material and measures to follow in the Facebook engagement approach. I’ve elucidated my standpoint regarding
Facebook’s prospective impact on news--that it can be effectively delivered by
means of timelines. If Facebook chose to
embody an array of news reporting, I’d hope that both its technical easiness as
well as the societal precedence put on Facebook would lead to enhancing both
comprehensive awareness of topics—as well as enhancing comprehensive research
knowledge of valid news sources--as users would be introduced to a novel
variety of news foundations that go beyond the customary.
No comments:
Post a Comment