I’ve got a love/hate relationship with art.
Scratch that-DID have a love/hate relationship with art.
As a kid, I drew… sketched… often-I never painted, refused
sculpting. I mainly drew cartoons, wide varieties
of buildings, flowers, and plants, though there were a few exceptions depending
on my mood. My mom being the utmost
support of my life, would take it upon herself to suspend these drawings all
over her office, giving me supreme confidence in my artistic ability.
That was how I began loving it.
As I began high school, I was certain an art class would
suit me well… It didn’t. I ended up with
a teacher that truly suppressed my artistic spirit. He was close-minded and rude, critiquing each
piece of mine in a downright negative outlook rather than furnishing constructive
criticism. He had favorites, and
regardless of long hours invested in a single project, my work would continue
being neglected as inferior.
That was how I began hating it.
Luckily, I declined quitting. While my first freshman college art class was
sadly somewhat similar to high school, I paid no mind to my misfortune and
proceeded to declare an Interactive Media Studies (IMS) minor as a sophomore.
My frequent attempt to describing the study of IMS is the art
of the media. Common courses for this field
denote adroitness with graphic design, professional writing on digital
platforms, image processing, digital photography, and more.
And since my luck with art unfolded the way it did, I met art
halfway. I declared being an IMS…
convergent track… minor, which aims for a more journalistic approach towards
employing artsy techniques of utilizing technology for communication purposes.
My first IMS course lead me to the reason for this blog-to explore
my rekindled love of art via Chicago’s art galleries.
Students were to visit one on a list of art galleries
downtown-I chose the Chicago Cultural Center.
And THIS… this is how I began loving it once more.
The exhibit currently holds two memorial stations in
celebrating two illustrious artists and their impact on art history: Archibald
J. Motley Jr. (1891-1981) and Charles C. Dawson (1889-1983). Motley was a Jazz Age Modernist in which his
work remarkably depicts both the chronicles of African-American history and the
Jazz Age’s urban culture within the 1920s-30s.
Dawson was a commercial artist who happened to be the first
African-American to establish a studio allocated to graphic design; his work
resembles advertising, illustrating a pop-art feel towards reflecting cultural
history.
I found both to be exceptionally fascinating, though I was strangely
reeled in and trapped for longer than anticipated by the art work of Motley.
The spectators’ journey to the gallery chamber of Motley begins
prior to the actual viewing and experiencing of the art. The exhibit holds, before walking in the
room, a long hall of quotes said from Motley himself, in which it provides for
the audience a clear and intriguing understanding of his intentions and
inspirations behind his creations.
It is within these quotes that provoke boundless
appreciation for Chicago, Chicago art and its influence on the city’s
history.
One quote reads, “Give the artist of the Race a chance to
express himself in his own individual ay… and we shall have a great variety of
art, a great art…” I find this as
revealing Chicago as a city of diversity in more than just an artistic
sense. The many elucidations behind the
meaning of art is complex but can be made simple when defining it in your own
terms.
I define art as anything that can be interpreted… Too
broad? Maybe so-but it compliments my
impression of the quote well. While I
interpret conveying race through art as merely encouragement for artists alone,
I perceive the words “a great variety of art,” “a great art” as portraying the
bigger picture at hand; I perceive the words as concrete representation of the
city of Chicago existing as… this “great art.”
Through Chicago’s insistence of integrating the value of
opposing races and alternative cultures into its art, the city stands as a
piece of artwork in itself. Chicago represents
a city encompassing African-American, Caucasian, Asian, Native-American, Hispanic,
and further ethnic citizens, in which it is not solely the their ethnic
appearance but the way in which they express that ethnicity that should paint
the perfect picture of Chicago.
With that being said, it is through both Motley and Dawson
that they expose Chicago history via not only their work rendered to depict African-American
past, but purely their previous status as an artist itself.
Although, allegedly, the cease of slavery occurred in the
year 1865, discriminatory affiliations were still rampant throughout the artists’
lifespans; however, both were African-American, and both were provided the
chance to share their unique, untraditional work through the opportunities and
resources Chicago offered.
Whereas outside American areas were enforcing race
segregation, artists such as Motley were free to paint people a larger array of
colors, implying cultural differences-in particular, paint the “American Negro”
honestly and exempt from poor stereotypical features; and Dawson, first
African-American owner of a graphic design studio, established allowance of constructing
the pieces that included products as intended for mixed-race individuals.
Art gave races a voice… a voice that received utter negation
spoken anywhere else.
Motley once said, “I can’t find anyplace like Chicago. You know, I love this place…”
Go discover why his love for Chicago was so vehement. You may not be artistic; you may not have much
care for art. You may, however, be an
advocate for history, and you certainly are a neighbor of Chicago; and in that
case, it’s never displeasing to witness both a passion for the home you reside
and a recap of how your own passion for Chicago was sculpted to what it stands
today.
No comments:
Post a Comment