Monday, June 8, 2015

My Last Post-My Favorite Media Personnel Today

Well, this is it... my last blog post regarding the new media for this new media course.

And since I've provided research, insight, and discourse, I chose to end blogging about something related to my specific role in the media currently; I explore my own personal list of my top 5 favorite media editorialists today, in no specific order.

1. Anderson Cooper : CNN 
Because he goes above and beyond political honesty.
2. Dylan Byers : Politico 
Because he baffles people by his immediate tweets and scoops at all hours.
3. Emily Smith : New York Post
Because her celebrity gossip focus is interesting and pertains to my interests of getting involved in the film field.
4. David Carr : New York Times
Because his opinions are respected enough to be deemed as "news."
5. Jim Romenesko : Blogger
Because I'm a blogger and look up to the extreme success of those that were able to make a career, a famous career nonetheless, out of blogging.

The Dark Side Depicted of Today's Disney Princesses

Now that I've blogged twice regarding blogs themselves, I'm dying to explore Alexandro Palombo, the blogger I've mentioned, and all his artwork.

I mentioned he rendered pop-art images to depict Disney princesses as acid-attacked Pakistan women who denied arranged marriages.  I didn't touch up on how many other Disney princess pictures he's created portraying alternate societal affairs.

Here are some of my favorites:

1. Acid attack survivors:

2. Breast cancer survivors:

3. Those handicapped/disabled:

4. Domestic violence:


5. Bullying


I can't express how much I love these photos.  I am a Disney fanatic, however, I've never come close to finding professional works as not only fascinating but as powerful as these.  This is the first writer, blogger, that I've fawned over and looked up to for guidance in conveying messages in a much more clever way that is unlike all the others-to, better critically think and see, thus expose, a much deeper side to what I'm discussing.  Since I am a Disney expert, I take deep note of how effective employing these princesses is when getting a point across.  They're rendered to represent even the most beautiful women iconized throughout the span of a substantial portion of society's childhood until now--depicting them as survivors and victims of some of today's most tragic stories.  This makes these princesses and their fairy-tale happy endings in an entirely new, not to mention powerfully saddening, perspective.  Unavoidably heart breaking or not, this is what it takes to retain viewers' interest and more importantly, their interpretation-for they can make their own sense of the issue and will increase their chances of getting further involved.

The breast cancer, acid attack, and handicapped princess art conveys physical beauty, in which the images render even those with physical illnesses and disabilities as princesses.  That, no matter the flaw, all women should be treated and looked at as high on the spectrum of a Disney princess.  Even more, they should be treated so because people just never know the real story behind their physical appearance-and I like to believe if you're human and you knew why, you'd never think otherwise of their princess characteristics.

The domestic violence princess/prince art conveys similar to the mentioned images--being to represent women with physical faults due to previous experiences; though, this conveys something deeper.  While it's Palombo's way of standing up for these women--depicting them once again as princesses that deserve proper treatment--it's also a way of standing up to them.  And by standing up to them, I mean giving them a wake-up call... that they are princesses and deserve to be treated like one.  Not to mention the notion that it looks just as devastating to see them in pain as it does these princesses.

The stop bullying princess art is the most powerful, and shocking, of all.  How could it not?  It's rendering our emblematic princesses as committing suicide.  Considered shocking or not, its devastating nature resembles exceptional authenticity.  It's the truth that needs to be heard.  These princesses, despite all their beauty and glory, are still unhappy-so much as so to want to end their lives.  The message is penetrating, and tremendously reflective: 
Bullying is serious, and needs to be brought greater awareness.
Over one million people die by suicide each year.
On average, one person dies by suicide every 40 seconds.
Global suicide rates have increased 60%.

Not only bullying but his other images as well represent Palombo's ability to boast his wretched posts due to the advantages and leeway writers are granted in blogging.  Bloggers are allowed to discuss their own interpretations of issues that either would be deemed inappropriate or would not be even brought up to start. 

I don't understand why Palombo's work isn't everywhere.  Alexsandro Palombo, my favorite blogger.

Why I Don't Care for Fashion Blogs, but why These Bloggers are Smart

Okay-I realize I've elucidated extensively my ardent appreciation of blogging.

I didn't, however, elucidate that I don't care for each and every style of blogging.

In fact, I dislike fashion blogging and all its measures.

Aside from the fact that I have no fashion sense (yes, I'm not afraid to admit it) and care so little about clothing and the way I dress, I perceive blogging as a way of freelance writing--of exploring and commenting on a wide array of issues. I don't perceive it as merely myriads of images that express ideas; I feel as though it diminishes us bloggers that are attempting to validate our credibility with discussing the more serious matters today.

Fashion blogging on Instagram
With all that being said, I take note of the fashion bloggers that are actual designers and have actual motive to blog.  I also take note of my proclamations that speak on behalf of blogging innovation.  Considering this, I reason with these bloggers and understand their purpose, though I find it's contrary to many alternative innovative means to blogging.

Needless to say, fashion bloggers are being smart-they're taking their business elsewhere and leaning towards a more prevalent Instagram presence.  I do believe these fashionistas are recognizing where blogging is going, and where Instagram has gone-that, in comparison to blogging, Instagram has given them the ability to solely post their fashion without entailing a lengthier descriptive caption.

Instagram should be the future of fashion posting, for it exemplifies the true depiction of fashion blogging-to enlighten fashion lovers with photos of clothes they would look best in as well as would buy.  Even more, Instagram is much more viewed and employed-fashion bloggers have a much higher change of gaining followers and advocates if they utilize this platform instead.


Blogging, the "Soul of the Internet"

Media scholar, Stephen Coleman, makes reference to blogging as the "soul of the Internet," in which he feels its has created an individualistic presence when utilizing the Internet. 

Originally made to annotate online information beginning in the year 1997, people today have a say, employing blogs as means of relaying information and research in a diary, journal-like manner.  Regardless of insufficient professional and journalistic background, their opinions are both heard and encouraged.

Blogs are a good illustration of:
1. Profile and friendship building
2. Business and innovative promotion
3. Educational improvement
4. Political and civil awareness

Opposing critics dispute these notions, denouncing blogging as rather an invasion of privacy, a violation to traditional advertising and commercialization, a further creator of this generation's cultivated downfall, and too greatly changing the game of politics. 

Bloggers don't reveal anything they don't want online; they reveal private information they want read, becoming tremendously personal with issues such as relationships in order to induce a more conversational approach to exploring societal issues.  Therefore, critics subjecting blogging as lacking privacy are false, for bloggers don't mind if they have "personal information floating publicly on a networked environment," according to intellectual Ferdinand Viegas.  

Bloggers grant professional advantages such as for business and innovative careers.  Businesses can read up on the opinions of their own products and services, as well as the opinions about their competitors.  It's a clever way of finding out truth, for simple commentary pieces such as these that need not be objective are a constructive way of hearing day to day discourse regarding their business.  Hence, when critics allege blogging as contrary to tradition, they're right, but wrong to perceive it negative, for the proof is in the pudding.  Blogging is prospering; orthodox means are not. 

Blogging has sparked debate in the classroom-could it be used for scholarly purposes or not?  I think yes.  Critics are suggesting that by allowing blogging, teachers and students, as well as just the students themselves, can converse about topics in a more unique and interesting way-in which homework would not be so dreadful because they're merely having conversation on their feelings, rather than memorizing and learning factual knowledge.  Whereas critics feel blogging is another source of research and reading diminution of today's generation, others believe it makes students formulate their own opinions on curriculum, and remembering functions easier because they associate their standpoint to the information to be known.  Because they're forced to sit down and blog, they're inevitably forced to sit down, read and then write.  Even more, it precipitates a more intimate teacher-student relationship, in which the more humane approach to viewing one another as more than just teacher and student generates greater success in school.  Teachers make all the difference in the world, and blogging is a positive step to getting their influence more prominent.

Bloggers have increased political and civil awareness, by making information more fascinating in comparison to the solemn methodologies of endeavoring to raise familiarity among these topics.  Bloggers such as Alexsandro Palombo illustrate unique techniques in getting points across that are often overlooked in the midst of all of society's clamor; he depicts through pop-art Disney princesses as Pakistan women who survived acid attacks, as their faces are rendered demented and twisted to look like the women that lose their beautiful face.  It's blogs such as these that raise the most effective awareness, because who cares if it's Disney princesses?--If anything, the idea is more evident because it's so iconic and relative that anyone can interpret the true meaning behind his images.  So yes, critics, they may be changing the game of politics, but in a way that is beneficial to society... a whole lot more beneficial than what's already been and being done.

I'm rooting for BuzzFeed! Who's with me?

I can’t help but discuss the alleged Facebook ‘news’ source that has been the cause of some of the most controversial Facebook debate today-BuzzFeed.

The majority of critics stand unsatisfied, perceiving this platform as excessively opinionated and an example of false or phony journalism.

And this lack of satisfaction has initiated a change, in which “after intense criticism, BuzzFeed backed down on the deletion of posts with ‘personal opinion’ in them,” according to Jay Rosen.

See, this is good.  This means that BuzzFeed has hope. 

I should have clarified my standpoint.

I like BuzzFeed.  I think there’s something to be said for its silliness, even sometimes pointlessness.

We’re a generation of relativity. 

The youth like reading and exploring works that stray from the overly solemn matters that have embodied society for far too long-we’re sick of reading pieces that evidently had to follow strict writing and ethical guidelines.  They welcome works that explore matters more pertinent to them and their personal lives, regardless of the insufficient professionalism.

That being said, I perceive BuzzFeed backing down as them working to be as best as they can be, so that critics won’t prevail in a complete BuzzFeed take down.

Ben Smith states, “We obviously need to do a better job of giving guidance to writers and editors on the place of personal opinion on the site.  That’s an ongoing conversation in which we’d love your input…”  Both the fact that they cognize their faults and listen as well as accept outside input reveals their willingness to be better-that, if what’s disputed is fixed, they can finally gain the positive reputation they desire.

So I’m rooting for BuzzFeed.  Who’s with me?

Why Campaign Coverage Doesn't Serve us Well

Finally!  Finally I am interested with something involved with the political media.

And yes, it's because of yet again, who I'm virtually stalking... Jay Rosen!

He recently posted a tweet linking users to his article and stating, "My new post tries to explain why the campaign coverage you're seeing now doesn't serve you well."

I couldn't agree more.  He explains that reporters today are failing to provide adequate interviews and questions that give us a true, profound understanding of the standpoints and plans of today's governmental candidates.

Even more, critics are suggesting that Reddit can be equally, if not more, effective than actual media professionals, for random individuals can just as easily formulate questions and conversations--if anything, better.  We're uninterested... because we have no reason to be interested.  No wonder politics are so hard to believe and trust.

Thursday, June 4, 2015

Tampa Bay, Ironically, Makes Chicago Stand Proud


With the extent of uproar the Blackhawks have provoked, instilled within the people of Chicago, it’s no surprise the media’s placed exceptional attention on all the clamor-as today’s journalists, broadcasters, bloggers, critics, and more long to being the first, and leading, media personnel to get involved in the most recent and hottest issues occurring today.

Patrick Sharp, my mother's "Sharpie"
Well, not me.  Beginning my career as a blogger of Chicago, my mother being the vehement Blackhawks devotee she is, would habitually plead for a post related to the Blackhawks, for she is committed to the dream of one day meeting her beloved Patrick Sharp, or as she calls him… her “Sharpie.”  She’s a woman of faith, exceptional faith in me, and is so strongly hoping enough Blackhawks blogs by me will grant her face-to-face interaction with Sharpie. 

I politely negated her requests, as I not only am not the biggest hockey fan, but I was certain everything had already been covered and discussed, and my work would resemble redundancy and lack uniqueness.  Though, my mother’s not the only Blackhawks fan of tremendous passion; in fact, her level of fervency probably stands insignificant in comparison to several others.  The Blackhawks have generated great success throughout recent years--winning the Stanley Cup twice in the last five years and going for their third championship this 2015--so it’s reasonable to deem this team as a cause of remarkable devoutness among the people of Chicago. 

With all that being said, this week finally ignited the need to write about the Blackhawks that my mother so desperately implored-and my chief reasoning for writing lies in my mother and her zealous devotion to supporting them. 

My reasoning derived earlier this week when finding that the Tampa Bay Lightning set both fan gear and ticket purchase restrictions on certain sections of the arena and for any fans outside of Florida zip codes.  Hence, I may not be a specialist on Blackhawks and hockey overall, but I do, however, love my mother deeply and take note of her passionate interests.  Therefore, I imagine my mother as if receiving the astounding chance to witness a Stanley Cup final in one of the seats they prohibited, in which the opposing team denies her utmost experience, leaving her slightly disappointed and frustrated-though would never outwardly show it because she’s far too optimistic and rarely exhibits fear, sadness, etc.  She doesn’t show it because she’s fixated on being the strong, kept-together woman she conveys, though that’s what irritates my inmost anger, for this theoretically should be the one occasion she need not come anything close than the opposite of strong and kept-together.  The same goes for all Blackhawks fans, including those restricted this Wednesday. 

I’m outraged, honestly.  However, I’m mostly proud. 

I’m outraged because having no affiliation and holding much ignorance to the rules of professional sports, I’m finding it so difficult to believe such restrictions aren’t considered illegal.  Forbidding outside fans, disallowing certain apparel?  This seems nothing less than that of an invasion of privacy, a violation to discriminatory laws.

I’m outraged because it appears discourteous and selfish, as I’m perplexed as to how a team could exclude even diminutively the pure, exceeding amusement fans get out of live hockey games, a Stanley Cup final nonetheless.  And for what-to increase the chances of winning?  That, with less Blackhawks fans, they’ll be what… less distracted?  Well, Lightning, less distracted or not, you made me very proud… proud to be a member of the Chicago Blackhawks family.

And I’m proud because these restrictions… They say something about Chicago; they say something about the Chicago Blackhawks, and they say something about the Chicago Blackhawks’ fan base. 

They reveal Chicago’s both historical and present foundation of successful professional athletics.  They reveal the Chicago Blackhawks’ fruitfulness, as even outsiders have even become intrinsically aware of the incomparable gratitude fans feel regarding the talent and personal character of the players; it reveals the intimidation they strike in opponents, as teams are willing to even eliminate just sections of support in order to potentially diminish the capacity of the players… which leads me to the revelation of the Blackhawks’ fan base.  Aside from revealing that our fans are evidently perceived as excessively more ardent and prevalent than customary, the mere fact that they only prohibited sections, rather than the full arena, reveals that the Blackhawks’ fan base has become so renowned for their affectivity, that the Lightning’s satisfied with keeping some parts of the arena free of Blackhawks apparel restrictions; but God forbid it be all.  These restrictions reveal that Chicago and the city’s Blackhawks have induced bewilderment among outsiders… Why are they not even so much so gifted but rather, why is their work ethic so consistent and hardworking-what’s the source?  I don’t deny the talent of other hockey teams including the Lightning; I shouldn’t being the hockey foreigner I remain, though I can’t help my biasness when I am a Blackhawks-surrounded inhabitant and the farthest from a Chicago foreigner.  Nevertheless, irrespectively of the alternate prosperous professionals and history of hockey I know nothing of, I do know something about our players from the talk of the media alone-and that’s that the Blackhawks are good, and teams recognize that.

So, I elucidated the origin of my motive to blog-though I chose to prolong the start of my writing because I had one more thing to do.  I had to see who won. 

I realize we’ve still got some games left, and I’m too superstitious to speak on behalf of how well they played to get us a win; I am here to say, however, that we DID win, less fans in the crowd or not.  Whether the live action of boundless exhilaration contributes to the Blackhawks’ success doesn’t matter-they’re going to play for their supporters regardless.  Fans present or not, our players still fully cognize and accept our desire for championships; they appreciate our desire to both see them win as well as hear their viewpoints and feelings concerning the game.  Conversely, the quantity and appearance of fans may have just been enough, and in that case, whether the exhilaration is boundless or not doesn’t matter, for solely a handful of Blackhawks fans can grant the city justice. 

Needless to say, no matter the final outcome, we did get one win, and it was a win attained no matter the Lightning restrictions.

I’m honored to be a part of city that’s subjected to such restrictions.  And I may be honored to be part of a city embodying an imposing sport establishment, though I’m even more honored to be part of a city embodying such a striking fan base; for it represents something greater than purely the city’s athletic ability, but the undying pride that depicts Chicago. 


So let’s go Chicago Blackhawks and let’s go fans!  Let’s encourage those wins that stimulate fear within our opposition.

Sunday, May 31, 2015

Chicago Music on a College Student Budget

My passion for Chicago, the city’s people, and its music grew this weekend.

I went to a free concert in the city.

That’s right—free. 

I can’t express my gratitude enough for Chicago’s willingness to embrace free concerts that broke college students like me can attend.  Chicago is home to a rich establishment of pricey musical events that take months to pay for either because you’re saving up or… waiting for your parents to finally cave.  It’s okay-we’ve all done it.

You have to take the good with the bad… Isn’t that what they always say?  Well, they’re right.  Paying as low as $15 or less up to as high as over a couple hundred dollars for concerts, performances, festivals can burn a hole in your wallet.  And yes, even that $15 can burn the hole-college students, back me up.  

But we go to them, right?  We still choose to save even those couple hundred bucks that we don’t have, those couple hundred bucks that should be saved for more serious items like school books and our future car; we still choose to beg our parents endlessly.  

We go to them because we appreciate the beauty of musicand how significant it is to our lives; we go to them because we understand how vital it is to make time for pure enjoyment, and how vital it is to take breaks from the more solemn aspects of life; we go to them because we’re human, and we like spending money on things that we’ll probably regret later, but for right now, are so worth it.  

So my point is that we have to take the good with the bad… that irrespectively of the many substantial expenses Chicago entails for entertainment, we’ll continue to proceed buying the tickets regardless; and most importantly, the city still provides musical events that everyone can join, whether two cents in your pocket or two hundred dollars.  It’s not Chicago’s fault the city is so expensive and that certain artists necessitate costly expenditure, so visit the concerts that Chicago can afford, without the demand for excessive ticket prices.  Not to mention these places--these restaurants, hotspots, bars, venues—don’t make ample revenue; they acquire earningsby holding an exciting, upbeat enough experience so that attendees will buy drinks, food, clothing, etc.  The fact that these places remain insistent says a lot about Chicago-that the city encompasses spots not only comprised of unselfish business and workers, but that these spots are lively enough to still profit successful income from visitors.

With all that being said, I realize that several of these concerts denote entertainers that may be distinctively new, have few experience, and often may be assumingly less talented.  While I must elucidate the concert I went to heldan imposing performance with what seemed like extremely talented performers; they were considered novel artists that did have less experience… which indicates my reasoning behind my flourished love for the people of Chicago.  

We don’t care.    

First ‘RSVP’ing,’ I felt particularly concerned whether the concert would be noticeably more monotonous due to the lack of overall familiarity regarding the song selection.  I agonizingly suspected the prospective crowd as resembling minimal motion, virtually no singing, chanting, or reciting of words or lyrics; worse, I fretted there wouldn’t even be a large enough crowd to resemble and observe.  

I was wrong.  

Upon arriving via cab, the driver explained the venue was “right on the corner,” and we’d run into it.  We were walking and searching longer than anticipated leading us tocheck our phones only to ascertain we had gone too far.  We reversed directions and walked back to the original place the driver was last—we had not even realized that the corner was directly in front of us.  We didn’t notice it… because we failed by underestimating the tremendously extensive line of people waiting to get in the concert that lingered outside the hall throughout the street.  My friends then told me the RSVPs closed within just a few hours after being postedwhich in terms of non-free concerts, this performance theoretically ‘sold out’ fleetingly.  

The people loved it.  The suspected absence of a full, copious crowd resembled a jam-packed, overflowing crowd, embodying a lavish variety of diverse individuals and dispositionsthe suspected motionless crowd resembled an exceptionally active crowd, vigorously dancing, jumping, and swaying; the suspected crowd personifying lack of caroling resembled remarkable chanting, endeavoring to grow acquainted enough with therap lyrics in order to partake in the songs.

I’d say these people were nice to the new artists, but that’s both too simple as well as potentially rendering the performers out to be less gifted if fans had to be ‘nice.’  I say, rather, the people were respectful.  They understand and take into keen account the probable dearth of experience, practice, and involvement with both this business and live experiences; they value their inclination to try; they acknowledge their motivation to execute an exhausting, notable performance, paying no mind to scarce revenue gains

I love the people of Chicago because we respect new artists, melodies, and performances.  We attend these concerts with poise and maturity, choosing to grasp newfound talent in an entertainer and neglect all oddstargeting the artists’ little performance background.  

Never to disregard the people of Chicago exhibit a desire for new music in general.  

We’re fiends for the latest up-to-date songs we can blare loudly; we’re fiends for innovative lyrics we can memorize; we’re fiends for the hottest new artists we can look up to and fawn over.  I love the people of Chicago because we appreciate the old, and we welcome the new.  We undyingly crave listening to new songs and artists while remaining unconditionally persistent to listen to those previous.  

My fellow concertgoers gave these performers and their music a chance.  They chose to stay through five full hours of a concert presenting uncommonly renowned rap artists that rapped limited songs and lyrics they knew.  And the ones they did know, the ones the rappers introduced as covers, they went wild for, joining in crowd harmony as they danced in constant motion and deafeningly rappedalong with the artist.  

The people’s enthusiasm for both new music and old helped incite my prospered passion for music.  I had never been to a concert with artists I knew nothing about performing unfamiliar songs.  Quite frankly, when my boyfriend brought it up I was greatly hesitant, though the experience further escalated my need for music and performances.  I discern my uncertainty as happening for a reason… that because my expectations were so low and the result was so high, I became better mindful of my adoration for the musical process itself.  I realize that I need notmandate solely artists I know personally and their lyrics I’ve remembered committedly-I’ll have the time of my life at a show as long as it has an artist to purely sing and lyrics to become conversant.  

This concert aided in my emerging passion for Chicago.  Through Chicago, my passion for people grew--through the people, my passion for music grew—and vise versa.  

Chicago remains home to kindling and rekindling all versions of love.  Free concerts became an addition to mylist of the city’s sundry sources of provoking my inner passions

So next time you’re bored, visit a free concert.  Even if you don’t know the artist, listening to beloved music genres live sure beats sitting at home.  

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

The Wonderful World of Virtual Communities

A media course this term required being an actual member of an online community for a set period of time in order to relay and explain the rich culture that embodies virtual communities.  We were to explore similar communities as well to better enhance our understanding.

I chose Pinterest, We Heart It, and Photobucket, in which I was introduced to the wonderful world of sharing and appreciating photography.














The hectic lifestyle a student, family member, boyfriend, friend, and internee entails limits much of my free time.  While I love my field of study, relationships, and job, I often miss the creative, free of pressure habits that life sets its damper.  I find deep fascination and passion for art, even more so with the process of taking and viewing photos-which is why these communities were perfect for me and suited my interests.

I learned that there's positives and negatives to online communities.

Positives:
  • Enhancement of knowledge concerning interest
  • Sharing of your own knowledge concerning interest
  • Feeling welcome among a group
  • Career, innovational, professional opportunities
  • Building personal profiles
  • Boosting confidence and self-awareness
Negatives:
  • Loss of human contact
  • Potential decrease in reading and research ability
  • Possibility of harsh and hurtful words and arguments
  • Potential lack of confidence in person
  • Fear/failure of eye contact

With Any Negative, Comes a Positive

With any negative criticism, there comes positive.  No matter the topic, they’ll remain two or more sides holding opposing opinions, in which each viewpoint encompasses evidence, reason, and debate providing credibility. 

In Facebook’s case, there’s been those critiquing the site as a ‘filter bubble,’ as previously explored in my blog, and those critiquing Facebook as balanced and fair; they perceive it as simply filtering information that we would most likely care to be updated, on the most consistent basis.  That is, whether or not there’s components such as ads and news that should receive greater emphasis, at the end of the day, this generation will get worn-out with posts that aren’t more personal and less relative-and more times than not, users would rather receive constant friend updates rather than more serious or professional matters.
As I’ve reasoned with the harsh criticism, I reason with the optimistic.  Though critics have warned Facebook, I feel Facebook is concentrated on the more youthful, less solemn opinions due to their most frequent usage; no young adult who’s uninvolved with media matters will desire to request a more editorial timeline.  Considering this, whether or not more information such as news-reporting should be implemented, the vast majority of users don’t want that, and the site wasn’t originally created for that, so why would Facebook change that and risk losing its audience and purpose? 

Don't Let Facebook Brainwash You.

Recently deemed a ‘filter bubble’ among critics, Facebook’s believed to filter only what it wants, producing a bubble of information unable to be popped with outside sources of material. 

I have many viewpoints supporting Facebook’s timeline, though I reason with these individuals.

I can’t deny certain aggravation Facebook’s provoked.  For example, they turn on your notifications--in which you have to go out of your way to search and find to turn off--for sending you updates on friends they choose to inform you. 

With how financially and reputably successful Facebook has become, they should have all the resources and motives necessary to further deepen the filter they discern most beneficial, helpful, and personal to us.
Even more, the ample quantity of promoted advertisements via Facebook has grown rampant-this is where I most intrinsically perceive this alleged filter bubble.  With the variety of ads encompassing Facebook, I feel it should be more cognizant of our interests and thus more invested in sponsoring them.  I wouldn’t mind viewing ads so much have they not be so non-relatable; I also wouldn’t mind observing articles and links related to current news issues I’d find interesting.  People aren’t fully acquainted with how often they search for news and the extent of news out there-they’d be unexpectedly, pleasantly surprised to learn of events they find fascinating for once.

Facebook should listen to the entirety of all critics’ opinion; they don’t negate the site as inferior.  They’re merely trying to warn it-because they do believe in its resources and don’t want to witness its downfall.  They don’t yearn for these harsh perspectives; they just don’t want it to get so severe as to become the transformation from a filter bubble… to utter brainwashing.

Facebook & New York Times Partnership

 Companies are shrewd to utilize social media to their advantage.  It helps get a name out there, making the content of their information as both easily accessible as well as edifying as possible.  Therefore, it’s evident news organizations would benefit significantly, for social media promotes prevalence merely because of the uncomplicated distribution of content (essentially shared articles that entail little to no effort). 

One news company had it right; New York Times contracted a partnership to Facebook this May.  As if New York Times doesn’t already hold an illustrious title, they will further their business by appealing to those Facebook users that maybe not so much necessarily haven’t heard of NYT, but for those users that aren’t particularly fascinated with the news overall-in which when Facebook forces the viewing of posts concerned with news issues, they’ll be their primary news source.

New York Times once again fruitfully becomes one of the utmost, most prominent news corporations of today’s audience. 

I’m ready to see a change.  I have not a single complaint or negative utterance to say regarding NYT; I’m encouraging, rather, alternate businesses encompassing news related material and measures to follow in the Facebook engagement approach.  I’ve elucidated my standpoint regarding Facebook’s prospective impact on news--that it can be effectively delivered by means of timelines.  If Facebook chose to embody an array of news reporting, I’d hope that both its technical easiness as well as the societal precedence put on Facebook would lead to enhancing both comprehensive awareness of topics—as well as enhancing comprehensive research knowledge of valid news sources--as users would be introduced to a novel variety of news foundations that go beyond the customary.  

If Twitter can do it, so can Facebook!

If you really invested some time into thinking about your Facebook timeline, what would you envision?  That’s easy I’m sure-shared links, photos, statuses, possibly a few ‘suggested’ or ‘sponsored’ ads. 

The vast, if not all, majority of these posts were exclusively created by friends on Facebook; that is, who you’re kept stable, consistent updates on are the hundreds, possibly thousands or additional, Facebook friends that you desire. 

Not essentially erroneous, though numerous critics have introduced the notion regarding Facebook as a potential news source, in which its contribution to breaking, international, daily, and more news could be tremendously impactful… and also beneficial. 

I consider these critics to hold reasonable argument.  While I don’t remain having a cynical attitude concerning Facebook’s modes of presenting information, I am involved in a journalistic field and heed the significance of news.  Courses teach that the need for news has remained undeviating; originally hearing that, my primary thought was ‘mmm… not so much.’  I struggled believing that because before beginning my love for media, I, and friends around or my age, rarely go out of our way to read newspapers, watch the news, look into virtual news articles or links-I failed to recognize the several variations of discovering and retrieving news.  

I didn’t take into account the extent to which we hear news via car radios, other channels on television, and frankly, word of mouth.  It seems irrational, though we converse on such a constant basis and it’s such a repetitive, habitual daily occurrence that not only do we fail to notice how much time we spend in dialogue, but how much is spoken about when communicating. 



I reconsidered-we don’t take strong enough note that we speak about issues regarding news almost exceptionally.  Whether we’re discussing political, local, school, personal news, we’re still constantly discussing it; we’re attracted to storytelling and reports that make us feel like we’re there. 

And the reason we like such vividly detailed storytelling is because we don’t like to feel like we missed out… on anything.  We don’t realize… but if we were put 10 years, even 10 days, back and were forced to read old or ancient news, we’d grow senseless.  So maybe a few people and I scuffle finding motive to read news-but we still yearn for it subconsciously as well as receive it with ease when presented to us by the instant. 

And ‘presented to us by the instant’ is more commonly distinct within the many mediums of social media, another way to which we hear the magnitude of news that I didn’t take into consideration; Twitter stands as a concrete example of sharing news for professional, promotional, and personal means.  That being said, the critics that demand a news-reporting role for Facebook have a point; if other sites can successfully do it and there’s a way news can be integrated to individuals’ everyday lives, why not? 

This could be extremely beneficial to society.  Just as following in the normative system of delivering and getting news, people would still be accessing information involuntarily, but accessing it nonetheless.  I believe there’s still a further technique to incorporate news while keeping users regularly cognizant, informed, and up-to-date with personal ties.

4 Reasons Lollapalooza is a Good 1st Festival


Blogging has allowed me to express my passion for music and concerts-festivals in particular.
I decided to go into greater detail regarding Lollapalooza.
I think it’s necessary I clarify throughout my festival-hopping years, I’ve developed a favorite… and it’s not Lollapalooza.  My favorite is North Coast Musical Festival-but that doesn’t matter. 
It doesn’t matter because my objective doesn’t aim to target my top reasons behind my superlative preference.  I’m here to list my top reasons behind why I feel Lollapalooza is a positive primary choice for those deciding which festival to experience this summer. 
1. Their music relates to all people.
Whatever music genre you favor, Lollapalooza embraces all. 
I had the time of my life at Spring Awakening, but you won’t find much besides Electric Dance Music and DJs such as Tiesto and Knife Party.  Alternative festivals such as North Coast and Bonnaroo are additional events that hold equivalent variations of music, though Lollapalooza encompasses music for more than just the diverse genres of our generation… but the diverse genres of all generations. 
They have concerts for old rock, hip-hop, heavy metal, and more.  And I say old as in ‘old school’ type of music… as in even our elders would find motive to listen to those in the line-up of Lollapalooza.
It’s a good initial step for getting you accustomed to the constant vibrations from the stages and speakers surrounding you.  Even if you’re a die-hard lover of a specific genre, almost always people can find even a few opposing songs of differing genres they enjoy. 
There’s more to a festival than just listening to music.  People are here because they appreciate the beauty of music overall.  So I say if you’re a beginner, appreciate it all first-and then go from there.
2. Their atmosphere embodies all ages.
There’s something to be said for a festival you can even bring your kids.
And I say that because I’ve seen a lot when it comes to these events. 
No one can deny nor defend that much of these festivals denote an abundance of young adults severely intoxicated or on drugs.  There’s been an excessive amount of talk concerning the younger generation today and their influence on concerts, EDM concerts in particular.  The overwhelming truth holds that these concerts have been home to not only this generation’s alcohol abuse, but their abuse of drugs such as those like MDMA, Ecstasy, LSD, and more; enough statistics relaying the hospital expenses and even deaths of these young adults has been rampant and alarming.
So while I’d be lying if I claimed I’d yet to see such instances at Lollapalooza, I’m telling the truth when I say you won’t see this on nearly as many occasions, as opposed to many others.
You see children and adults of all ages, which is comforting for someone who is purely there for the music and not the dangerous means to partying. 
3. You’re surrounded by all styles of people.
To say certain festivals resemble certain bodies of people is an understatement.
It’s no stereotype that Spring Awakening is a festival of beads, flashy attire, and psychedelic souvenirs.  Young individuals embellish their bodies with beads all down their limbs and face and flamboyant, sometimes provocative, inappropriate clothing; they bring and buy tools such as colorful hula hoops and light up gloves in order to make a hallucinogenic experience for their fellow festival goers.
But not at Lollapalooza.  You see these people, though without such predominance. 
I find this so vital to a first experience as a result of my comparison to my own.  I evoke initially arriving at such a festival and feeling utterly out of place with everyone around me.  My friends were dressed correspondingly, but such a limited set of average dressed friends in a sea of such glitzy dressed individuals is intimidating. 
Avoid feeling unwelcome… especially if you’re just not one to typically dress that way.  There’s further concerts that suit your love for music while also suiting your style.
4. “Boxed water is better.”
This reads on Lollapalooza’s untraditional boxed water.
Less deep, more silly, but a reason nonetheless.
Lollapalooza remains a worthy beginner merely because of its interesting, unique features.
No more bottled water-they offer BOXED.  Sound outlandish?  Maybe so-but they’ve racked up exceptional business and production through their willingness to offer boxed water rather than bottled.
These boxes are essentially much more fulfilling than bottles, so when there the first day and growing irately cognizant of how hot and exhausted you are, you’ll be pleased to discover a set of water that suffices your needs.  Not to mention their attractive appearance that makes your experience seem that much more exceptional and unlike all the others.